Daramdin at the lap of Barsey Sanctuary |
The PRA and its
outcome:
Conducting PRA exercise, I considered among the
other to estimate the transition taken place in the production of
potato within the six panchayat wards (Ramitey, Lower Ribdi, Upper Ribdi, Lower
Bhareng, and Upper Bharen) in the territorial jurisdiction of present Eco
Development Committee. I took 1997 as the base year and year 2012 as
current year to estimate and to compare changes in production
profile of potato in the village.
The result of approximate community estimation
is as follows:
Production in the year 1997:
40,20,000 Kg or 40,200qtls
Production in the year 2012:
11,40,000 Kgs or 11,400 Qtls.
Current Average
Prize INR 18/kg
Possible income at current prize with the
production of base year = 40,20,000 Kgs X INR 18= INR 7,23,60,000
Income at current prize with the production of
current year= 11,40,000 kgs X INR 18 =INR 2,05,20,000.
The income difference arises if
present production would be at least at the level of base year
or 1997 is = INR7,23,60,000-INR 2,05,20,000= INR 5,18,40,000. The approximate
lost in villagers income due to fall in production of potato is estimate at
Rupees five crore, eighteen lakhs and forty thousand which could be hardly
compensated by any type of subsidies or aid given by the government as a
provision to mitigate the lost happen to the villagers on such account of
failure of potato production or other crop likewise. In the same manner decline
in maize production is too stiff here. Mr. Nima Sherpa, a local resident
informed that production of maize falls from around 520 kgs earlier in
1997 to 3- 4 kg at present in his plot.
Causes of Crop Failure
As per the statements given by the villagers the
causes of such a stiff fall in production are among the others ban on supply of
chemical fertilizers, excessive crop damage by wildlife like Wild Boar,
Porcupine, Himalayan Black Bear and other animals being the village lies in
forest fringe area of Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary, decline in production of
cow dong and organic manure due to the ban on collection of litters from forest
and ban on grazing therein. In some cases it is appeared that the problem is so
acute which compelled villagers to abandon their traditional practices and
their residential home in favour of living life as marginalized
unskilled industrial labour outside.
Community suggestion for conflict resolution:
The measures suggested by the community therein
includes lifting of 100 percent ban on grazing with certain regulatory measures
enabling rotational grazing in fringe forest, lifting the ban on collection of
litters and to allow collection at least to limited extent of fringe forest,
departmental support for crop insurance, increase in the quantum of monetary
compensation for damage of crop by wild interference etc. So the judicious
reconsideration of certain governmental policies, agricultural or
forestry is the call of hour which enables the protection of the right of
indigenous forest dwellers, tribal and forest dependent community.
The end note:
Himalaya faces the challenge of man animal conflict and extreme crop damage at the conserved fringe area of National Park, Wildlife Sanctuary and Reserved Forest in the Himalayan belt. Its health and conservation is
primarily depend upon the will power of its real guard, the Himalayan
community. The inspiration to them to protect Himalaya arises only in
protecting the right of aboriginals of the Himalayas. Among the others approach, an intensified efforts to promote ecotourism and homestay in Himalayas may be another way to safe this dwindling community and to make their living better.
Comments
Post a Comment